Regression fallacy

en

WikiRank.net
ver. 1.6.2

Regression fallacy

Quality:

Regression fallacy - argumentative fallacy. Article “Regression fallacy” in English Wikipedia has 13.4 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 2 references and 6 sections. The article also contains templates indicating quality issues, therefore its score was reduced by 0.7 points.

This article has the best quality in Ukrainian Wikipedia. However, this article is the most popular in English version.

Since the creation of article “Regression fallacy”, its content was written by 55 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 114 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 165 times in English Wikipedia and cited 742 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

  • Local (English): #10801 in March 2004
  • Global: #34072 in March 2004

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

  • Local (English): #226456 in April 2015
  • Global: #303360 in July 2008

There are 8 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

Languages with the highest quality

#LanguageQuality gradeQuality score
1Ukrainian (uk)
Помилка регресу
16.1694
2English (en)
Regression fallacy
13.3653
3Thai (th)
เหตุผลวิบัติเพราะการคืนสภาพ
11.9217
4French (fr)
Régression fallacieuse
9.2046
5Arabic (ar)
مغالطة التراجع
8.6446
6Chinese (zh)
迴歸謬誤
5.9371
7Japanese (ja)
回帰の誤謬
3.5233
8Hebrew (he)
כשל רגרסיה
0.978
More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

Most popular in all the time

The most popular language versions of the article "Regression fallacy" in all the time
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Regression fallacy
329 244
2Japanese (ja)
回帰の誤謬
54 772
3French (fr)
Régression fallacieuse
35 913
4Chinese (zh)
迴歸謬誤
25 621
5Hebrew (he)
כשל רגרסיה
19 829
6Arabic (ar)
مغالطة التراجع
1 526
7Ukrainian (uk)
Помилка регресу
386
8Thai (th)
เหตุผลวิบัติเพราะการคืนสภาพ
269
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

Most popular in June 2025

The most popular language versions of the article "Regression fallacy" in June 2025
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Regression fallacy
809
2Japanese (ja)
回帰の誤謬
155
3Chinese (zh)
迴歸謬誤
78
4French (fr)
Régression fallacieuse
72
5Hebrew (he)
כשל רגרסיה
25
6Arabic (ar)
مغالطة التراجع
17
7Thai (th)
เหตุผลวิบัติเพราะการคืนสภาพ
13
8Ukrainian (uk)
Помилка регресу
5
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

The highest AI

Language versions of the article "Regression fallacy" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Regression fallacy
55
2French (fr)
Régression fallacieuse
19
3Hebrew (he)
כשל רגרסיה
15
4Chinese (zh)
迴歸謬誤
10
5Japanese (ja)
回帰の誤謬
6
6Arabic (ar)
مغالطة التراجع
5
7Thai (th)
เหตุผลวิบัติเพราะการคืนสภาพ
2
8Ukrainian (uk)
Помилка регресу
2
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

The highest AI in June 2025

Language versions of the article "Regression fallacy" with the highest AI in June 2025
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1Arabic (ar)
مغالطة التراجع
0
2English (en)
Regression fallacy
0
3French (fr)
Régression fallacieuse
0
4Hebrew (he)
כשל רגרסיה
0
5Japanese (ja)
回帰の誤謬
0
6Thai (th)
เหตุผลวิบัติเพราะการคืนสภาพ
0
7Ukrainian (uk)
Помилка регресу
0
8Chinese (zh)
迴歸謬誤
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

The highest CI

Language versions of the article "Regression fallacy" with the highest Citation Index (CI)
#LanguageCI awardRelative CI
1Chinese (zh)
迴歸謬誤
248
2English (en)
Regression fallacy
165
3Arabic (ar)
مغالطة التراجع
149
4Ukrainian (uk)
Помилка регресу
123
5Thai (th)
เหตุผลวิบัติเพราะการคืนสภาพ
38
6Hebrew (he)
כשל רגרסיה
9
7French (fr)
Régression fallacieuse
6
8Japanese (ja)
回帰の誤謬
4
More...

Scores

Estimated value for Wikipedia:
English:
Global:
Popularity in June 2025:
English:
Global:
Popularity in all years:
English:
Global:
Authors in June 2025:
English:
Global:
Registered authors in all years:
English:
Global:
Citations:
English:
Global:

Quality measures

Interwikis

#LanguageValue
arArabic
مغالطة التراجع
enEnglish
Regression fallacy
frFrench
Régression fallacieuse
heHebrew
כשל רגרסיה
jaJapanese
回帰の誤謬
thThai
เหตุผลวิบัติเพราะการคืนสภาพ
ukUkrainian
Помилка регресу
zhChinese
迴歸謬誤

Popularity rank trends

Best Rank English:
#226456
04.2015
Global:
#303360
07.2008

AI rank trends

Best Rank English:
#10801
03.2004
Global:
#34072
03.2004

Languages comparison

Important global interconnections (July 2024 – June 2025)

Wikipedia readers most often find their way to information on Regression fallacy from Wikipedia articles about Regression toward the mean, Questionable cause, List of fallacies, Post hoc ergo propter hoc and Worse-than-average effect. Whereas reading the article about Regression fallacy people most often go to Wikipedia articles on Post hoc ergo propter hoc, Regression toward the mean, Fallacy, Just-so story and Informal fallacy.

Cumulative results of quality and popularity of the Wikipedia article

List of Wikipedia articles in different languages (starting with the most popular):

News from 28 January 2026

On 28 January 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: 2025–26 UEFA Champions League, Nipah virus, Doomsday Clock, UEFA Champions League, Elena Rybakina, Donald Trump, 2026 European Men's Handball Championship, killing of Alex Pretti, Kristi Noem, deaths in 2026.

In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Ajit Pawar, Border 2, Sharad Pawar, Killing of Alex Pretti, Ilhan Omar, Sunetra Pawar, Todd Monken, Kristi Noem, Wonder Man (miniseries), Gregory Bovino.

About WikiRank

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information